Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, and Canadian The pavement design engineers of the state highway agencies, The intended recipients of the survey questionnaire were ¢ Development of training programs and implementation ¢ Benefits accrued to the agency from implementation ¢ Agency lessons learned that can be used to help other ¢ Approaches and parties involved in the evaluation and ¢ Agency implementation challenges or impediments. Ment the MEPDG and AASHTOWare Pavement ME ¢ Reasons an agency has postponed or has yet to imple. ¢ Availability and quality of required data inputs.
¢ Level of staff expertise in ME pavement design principles. ¢ Use of consultants and in-house personnel for pavement This structure for successful implementation. ¢ Organizational structure and steps required to work within ¢ Agency decision-making authority for pavement design. The questionnaire focused on the practices, policies,Īnd procedures that have been successfully used by highwayĪgencies for implementing the MEPDG and AASHTOWare Provincial transportation agencies in relation to the MEPDGĪnd accompanying AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design⢠Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.Ī survey was developed to determine the implementationĮfforts of U.S., Puerto Rico, and Canadian state highway and Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book.